List of 2023 Budget and Audit Committee Meetings
November 16, 2023
| Agenda | Video | Agenda Packet | Transcript | Video Backup |
AI summary
The following summary was generated by an AI model from the meeting's transcript, agenda, and agenda packet, and may contain errors.
Item 1: Call to Order and Roll Call
This item was not taken up at the meeting.
Item 2: Public Comment on Non-agenda Items
Debbie D'Souza, a resident of Clayton, spoke about her review of the city's budget and checkbook, highlighting her interest in the city's solar project and its potential to generate income. She expressed appreciation for the city's efforts in pursuing energy efficiency and asked whether the city had explored ways to generate income from solar energy. She also inquired about the availability of Brett’s job description and the results of a recent review that had been mentioned on social media.
Mayor Jeff Wan responded, explaining that the city is engaged in an ongoing energy infrastructure project with Climatech, which is expected to continue for at least the remainder of the year and possibly beyond. He noted that the city is limited in its ability to earn money from solar due to PG&E regulations but is exploring all available options. He confirmed that the job description for Brett is available in a brochure from earlier in the year and that a six-month evaluation had been conducted, with no reportable actions found.
Another speaker, identified as Speaker 3, addressed rumors circulating on social media, particularly regarding concerns about the city's financial stability and the potential for a parcel tax. He criticized the spread of misinformation and the use of the city manager’s concerns to push for a parcel tax, noting that the majority of Clayton residents are opposed to such measures. He also mentioned a rumor about the mayor attempting to fire the city manager, which he attributed to a past CBCA board member and expressed concern about the organization’s behavior.
Keywords: solar project, energy efficiency, PG&E regulations, job description, parcel tax, social media rumors, city manager concerns
Item 3: Action Items
The Budget/Audit Committee discussed the first quarter (July 1–September 30) budget status for the General Fund and Landscape Maintenance District Fund, as well as the quarterly financial report on the city’s investment portfolio. The Finance Director, Brett, noted that while revenue trends were difficult to assess in Q1 due to the timing of property tax and sales tax collections, the city was generally within budget. Most revenue comes in December and April, with sales tax collected in arrears, making early-quarter analysis limited. Departments were adhering to their spending plans, and the city was confident in its ability to manage the remainder of the fiscal year.
Mayor Jeff Wan emphasized the importance of using home sales data as a proxy for property tax revenue trends, noting that the city could better predict receipts by analyzing directional changes in sales rather than focusing on exact figures. He also expressed a desire for quicker access to unaudited financial results for FY23 to aid in planning, though he acknowledged the audit process required time.
Regarding the investment portfolio, the Finance Director, Pat, reported that the city earned $52,000 in the quarter, with a focus on U.S. Treasury investments and higher-yield options. He explained that the city had shifted funds from lower-yield accounts to higher-yield ones and had invested $700,000 in U.S. Treasuries. The committee requested more detailed reports, including transaction logs and average daily cash balances, to better understand the investment activity and cash flow.
Public comment included suggestions for improving transparency, such as posting monthly investment statements and participating in Treasury auctions directly rather than through brokers. The discussion also touched on the city’s reserve policy, with current reserves exceeding 100% of the general fund, prompting a planned February review of reserve levels and their appropriate use.
Keywords: budget status, property tax revenue, investment portfolio, financial report, reserve policy, higher-yield investments, unaudited results
Item 4: Adjournment
Adjournment at [0:42:47].
See the full transcript here.
August 14, 2023
| Agenda | Video | Agenda Packet | Transcript | Video Backup |
AI summary
The following summary was generated by an AI model from the meeting's transcript, agenda, and agenda packet, and may contain errors.
Item 1: Call to Order and Roll Call
This item was not taken up at the meeting.
Item 2: Public Comment on Non
The Budget/Audit Committee meeting commenced at 4:00 p.m. with Mayor Jeff Wan calling the meeting to order. He noted that both committee members were present and confirmed that the meeting was proceeding as scheduled. The first agenda item was public comment on non-agenda items, which are matters not listed on the official agenda but within the committee’s jurisdiction. Mayor Wan invited members of the public to speak, emphasizing that each speaker would be limited to three minutes, as per the committee’s rules.
After a brief pause, City Manager Prati confirmed that no members of the public had raised their hands to speak, either in person or via the Zoom platform. No further discussion or comments were offered during this segment. As a result, the committee moved forward without any public input on non-agenda items.
Keywords: Budget/Audit Committee, Mayor Jeff Wan, Public Comment, Non-Agenda Items, Zoom Platform, Committee Rules, City Manager Prati
Item 3: Action Items
The Budget/Audit Committee discussed the city's quarterly financial report on the investment portfolio for the period ending June 30, 2023. The report detailed the city's investment strategy, which focuses on maximizing yield while maintaining liquidity. The city's total interest for fiscal year 2022–2023 was approximately $238,000, with $71,000 received from UBS in the second quarter of 2023. The city's investment portfolio includes a mix of CDs, federal agency securities, and U.S. Treasury notes, with the current yield at 1.99% and an average duration of 1.94 years.
Mayor Jeff Wan raised questions about the allocation of funds between the CAMP and LAIF accounts, noting that CAMP offers a higher yield than LAIF. He suggested that the city should prioritize moving funds to higher-yielding accounts, even if the difference in yield is significant. The city manager, Prati, explained that the city continues to reinvest maturing funds into higher-yielding investments and that the current interest rate environment is favorable for locking in higher yields.
The discussion also covered the city's strategy for managing cash flow and liquidity, with a focus on reinvesting maturing funds into higher-yielding instruments. The city has made recent investments in two CDs yielding 5.45% and 5.25% over two- and three-year terms, respectively. The city manager emphasized that the strategy is to hold investments to maturity and avoid selling them before maturity to prevent potential losses.
Councilmember Kim Trupiano and others raised additional questions about the city's investment policy, the impact of interest rate fluctuations, and the potential for a more diversified investment strategy. The city manager and finance director addressed these concerns, explaining that the city's approach is to balance yield, liquidity, and cash flow needs while avoiding unnecessary risks.
Public comment was also taken, with one speaker suggesting that the city should consider moving to a more liquid investment strategy, such as U.S. Treasury notes, and another emphasizing the importance of understanding the long-term interest rate environment. The committee closed the discussion with no further items to address.
Keywords: investment portfolio, interest rate environment, CAMP vs LAIF, CDs yield 5.45%, reinvest maturing funds, liquidity management, higher-yielding accounts, diversified investment strategy
Item 4: Adjournment
Adjournment at [1:00:52].
See the full transcript here.
May 30, 2023
| Agenda | Video | Agenda Packet | Transcript | Video Backup |
AI summary
The following summary was generated by an AI model from the meeting's transcript, agenda, and agenda packet, and may contain errors.
Item 1: Call to Order and Roll Call
Call to Order and Roll Call at [0:00:00].
Item 2: Public Comment on Non
Mayor Jeff Wan opened the public comment period for non-agenda items, inviting members of the public to speak. Councilmember Kim Trupiano noted that there were no speaker cards or raised hands on Zoom, indicating no members of the public had requested to speak. Based on this, Mayor Wan closed the public comment period and moved directly into action items. The first action item on the agenda was the quarterly financial reports on the city's investment portfolio, which Brett was scheduled to present.
Keywords: public comment period, financial reports, investment portfolio, action items
Item 3: Action Items
The city manager provided an overview of the quarterly financial reports on the city's investment portfolio for the periods ending December 31, 2022, and March 31, 2023. The report highlighted the current investment strategy, which includes transitioning to longer-duration investments to maintain interest rates amid anticipated Federal Reserve rate reductions. The current portfolio includes money market funds with yields over 4%, but the city is aiming for a target yield of 2.5% to 3% in the short term. The city manager emphasized the importance of working with UBS to develop a long-term investment strategy that balances liquidity, yield, and risk management.
The city manager also discussed the inclusion of medium-term notes and corporate bonds in the portfolio, explaining that these investments fall under the government code and are considered medium risk. The city is moving toward maximizing yield while adhering to investment policy limits. The city manager cautioned against using investments as a budget-balancing tool, referencing past issues in other agencies.
Regarding the proposed FY 2023-24 operations and maintenance budget, the city manager outlined the current state of the general fund, which is nearly balanced with the use of one-time pension reserves. The budget reflects a net deficit of $28,000 before supplemental changes, which would balance the budget. The city manager noted that operating expenses are expected to rise due to inflation and increasing service delivery costs, and the city is exploring ways to enhance efficiency and implement technology to reduce future costs.
The city manager also addressed the need for salary adjustments for key positions, including the finance director, community development director, police chief, and assistant city manager, to improve recruitment and retention. The proposed budget includes a $50,000 increase in salaries for these roles.
The city manager acknowledged the need for a more structured approach to fund balance policy, suggesting that a portion of the surplus be allocated to capital reserves, pension reserves, and operating reserves. The city manager also discussed the importance of evaluating the city's purchasing policy and refining it to ensure compliance with government regulations.
Public comment was closed after the presentation, and the council moved on to the next item.
Keywords: investment strategy, target yield range, long-term investment, medium-term notes, budget deficit, salary adjustments, fund balance policy, purchasing policy
Item 4: Adjournment
Adjournment at [1:14:30].
See the full transcript here.
May 15, 2023
| Video | BAC_SpecialSession_Agenda_05_15_2023 | Transcript | Video Backup |
AI summary
The following summary was generated by an AI model from the meeting's transcript, agenda, and agenda packet, and may contain errors.
Item 1: Call to Order and Roll Call
Call to Order and Roll Call at [0:00:03].
Item 2: Public Comment on Non - Agenda Items
The Budget/Audit Committee began its session with a public comment period for non-agenda items. Speaker 3, who was identified as the moderator, opened the floor for public input, noting that individuals in attendance or participating remotely had the opportunity to speak. However, Speaker 8, who appeared to be a committee member, pointed out that no hands had been raised, indicating that there were no speakers wishing to address the committee on non-agenda items. In response, Speaker 3 confirmed that the public comment period would be closed. Before moving on to the next agenda item, Speaker 3 took the opportunity to welcome the new city manager, Mr. Brett Perbula, expressing gratitude for his arrival. No further discussion or action was taken on non-agenda items during this segment.
Keywords: public comment period, non-agenda items, new city manager, welcome speech, committee member, speaker confirmation
Item 3: Action Items
The Budget/Audit Committee discussed the proposed update to the master fee schedule, presented by Nitish Sharma of GovInvest. The update aimed to ensure full cost recovery for city services, incorporating actual costs rather than estimated time-based fees. Key areas reviewed included planning and development fees, police services, environmental review, and facility rental fees.
Nitish explained that deposits were adjusted to reflect actual costs, including legal and engineering expenses, and that the city would monitor deposits to ensure they cover project costs. He also highlighted new fees, such as those for technology impact, and clarified that some previously unitemized costs, like county filing fees and mileage, were now included for transparency.
Council members raised questions about the methodology, including how fees for tree removal and picnic area rentals were calculated. They noted that some fees, like the $5,000 deposit for annexation, were based on actual costs rather than time estimates. Concerns were raised about the clarity of fee categories and the need for maps to identify specific areas affected by fees.
The committee also discussed the inclusion of a technology impact fee to cover future software costs, with some members expressing support for this approach. Regarding facility rental fees, the committee requested clearer labeling and maps to help identify specific areas.
The discussion concluded with the committee acknowledging the need for a policy on street closures and the importance of setting clear guidelines for fee waivers. The updated fee schedule was to be brought back to the full council for adoption, likely as part of a budget workshop.
Keywords: master fee schedule, cost recovery, actual costs, technology impact fee, fee categories, fee waivers, budget workshop
Item 4: Adjournment
Adjournment at [1:00:22].
See the full transcript here.
April 24, 2023
| Agenda | Agenda Packet |
March 27, 2023
| Video | BAC_SpecialSession_Agenda_03_27_2023 | Transcript | Video Backup |
AI summary
The following summary was generated by an AI model from the meeting's transcript, agenda, and agenda packet, and may contain errors.
Item 1: Call to Order and Roll Call
Call to Order and Roll Call at [0:00:00].
Item 2: Public Comment on Non - Agenda Items
The Budget/Audit Committee began the public comment segment for non-agenda items. Councilmember Kim Trupiano noted there were two speaker cards, and the first speaker was identified as "Mr. Killer." However, no public comments were made during this segment. The discussion quickly moved on to action items, with no further remarks or interventions from members of the public or committee members regarding non-agenda items.
Keywords: public comment, non-agenda items, speaker cards, Mr. Killer
Item 3: Action Items
The Budget/Audit Committee discussed the status and timeline for the FY 2023–2024 budget and the update to the city’s master fee schedule. Finance Director Angeline Loeffler and Finance Consultant Nitish Sharma provided an overview of the current timeline, which includes distributing budget worksheets to department leaders starting March 1, initiating the master fee schedule interview process with department leaders on March 10, compiling information by April 7, and presenting preliminary proposals to the city manager and the Budget/Audit Committee on April 24. Further updates were scheduled for May 22, with budget workshops planned for June 6. The committee noted that the April 24 meeting would present the initial budget proposals, while the May 22 meeting would serve as a workshop for feedback and revisions. Concerns were raised about the timeline, with some members suggesting the possibility of accelerating the process or holding additional meetings if needed.
Public comment included concerns from residents about potential hidden taxes through the master fee schedule and the inclusion of unfunded pension liabilities in fee calculations. Ed Miller referenced Proposition 26, which defines the difference between taxes and fees, emphasizing the need for transparency in the fee schedule process. Another speaker encouraged the committee to consider how increased fees might affect the city’s unfunded liabilities.
The committee then moved to item 3B, a review of active service contracts. Angeline Loeffler presented a list of 48 active contracts, primarily professional services, excluding day-to-day operations like copy machine renewals. She noted that most contracts were annual or had three-year terms with renewal options. She also highlighted the lack of a centralized spreadsheet to track contract dates and the need to digitize and organize existing contracts. Council members raised questions about the accuracy of the list, the lack of contract expiration dates, and the need for historical spending data to better understand the contracts’ scope and usage.
Several specific contracts were discussed, including Precision Civil Engineering, Apex Technology, and JNR Floor Services, with clarification on their roles and services. Concerns were raised about the lack of transparency, potential overlaps in services, and the need for better coordination between departments and vendors. The committee also discussed the need for a more robust bidding process for larger contracts and the importance of consolidating services where possible to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
The discussion concluded with a commitment to revisit the master fee schedule and active contracts in future meetings, with the next review expected in May.
Keywords: FY 2023–2024 budget, master fee schedule, budget timeline, unfunded pension liabilities, active service contracts, contract transparency, fee schedule process, budget proposals
Item 4: Adjournment
Adjournment at [1:09:00].
See the full transcript here.
February 27, 2023
| Video | BAC_SpecialSession_Agenda_02_27_2023 | Transcript | Video Backup |
AI summary
The following summary was generated by an AI model from the meeting's transcript, agenda, and agenda packet, and may contain errors.
Item 1: Call to Order and Roll Call
This item was not taken up at the meeting.
Item 2: Public Comment on Non - Agenda Items
The Budget/Audit Committee meeting commenced at 4:00 p.m. with the roll call, during which Councilmember Kim Trupiano and Mayor Jeff Wan confirmed their presence. The Finance Director, Angeline Loeffler, was also present. The meeting then moved to the public comment segment for non-agenda items, as outlined in Agenda Item 2. The chairperson invited members of the public to speak on matters within the Committee’s jurisdiction that were not included on the formal agenda. Each speaker was limited to three minutes, as per the rules established for the meeting.
At this point in the transcript, no members of the public have yet spoken. The chairperson, referred to as Speaker 2 in the transcript, is still addressing the audience, asking if anyone online wishes to make a comment on non-agenda items. The meeting is still in the early stages of this segment, and no substantive discussion or statements from the public have been recorded in the provided transcript span.
Keywords: public comment, non-agenda items, speaker limit, meeting rules
Item 3: Action Items
The Budget/Audit Committee convened to discuss the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Mid-Year Budget Update, presented by Finance Director Angeline Loeffler and Finance Consultant Nitish Sharma. The update covered the city’s general fund operating budget of $5.4 million (excluding ARPA funds), with an estimated $81,000 in additional revenue from property taxes, vehicle license fees, franchise fees, and interest earnings. The budget also included a discussion of the $127,000 ARPA transfer from the previous year, which was used to balance the original budget. Committee members noted that while the current budget appears to be in a strong position, the final outcome would depend on factors such as salary savings from vacant positions and potential changes in revenue streams.
The presentation also outlined the city’s investment policy, which was under review for updates. The current policy was criticized for being vague on roles and responsibilities, particularly regarding who is responsible for investment decisions. A proposal for a revised policy was discussed, with suggestions to clarify investment objectives, liquidity requirements, and the inclusion of periodic reviews of investment performance. The committee also expressed interest in moving funds from the LAIF account to a higher-yield investment account, starting with a $500,000 transfer, to improve returns.
A fee study was also discussed, which aimed to ensure full cost recovery for city services. The study would involve analyzing labor costs, including unfunded liabilities, and determining appropriate fee rates based on the time and resources required to provide services. The committee requested that the fee study be aligned with the city’s budget calendar and that a draft be presented at the next Budget/Audit Committee meeting on March 27.
The discussion also touched on the ARPA funds, with the committee noting that the remaining balance in the Pandemic Reserve Fund was approximately $1.4 million, plus an additional $204,000 from the previous year. The committee planned to address the allocation of these funds at the April 4 meeting, alongside the Climate Tech project, to ensure a comprehensive review of the city’s financial needs.
Public comment was limited, with only one speaker offering insights on investment strategies, emphasizing the importance of limiting investment durations and avoiding complex financial instruments due to the city’s limited resources. The committee agreed to incorporate feedback into the revised investment policy and to continue discussions on budget updates, fee studies, and ARPA fund allocations in subsequent meetings.
Keywords: Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget, ARPA Transfer, Investment Policy, Fee Study, LAIF Account Transfer, Pandemic Reserve Fund, Climate Tech Project
Item 4: Adjournment
Adjournment at [1:33:25].
Item 11: Municipal Bonds of the State of California or Local
This item was not taken up at the meeting.
See the full transcript here.
January 23, 2023
| Agenda | Video | Agenda Packet | Transcript |
AI summary
The following summary was generated by an AI model from the meeting's transcript, agenda, and agenda packet, and may contain errors.
Item 1: Call to Order and Roll Call
Call to Order and Roll Call at [0:00:14].
Item 2: Public Comment on Non
Public comment on non-agenda items was opened, with the chair inviting members of the public to speak on matters not listed on the agenda. The chair noted that each speaker would be limited to three minutes, as per the committee’s guidelines. No members of the public spoke during this time. The chair confirmed that no comments were received and moved on to the next item.
Keywords: public comment, non-agenda items, speaker limit, three minutes
Item 3: Action Items
The Budget/Audit Committee reviewed the audited annual financial report of the City of Clayton for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, presented by Bryce Rojas, the auditor, and Nitish Sharma, the interim finance director. The report indicated that the city received a clean, unmodified opinion on its financial statements, confirming that they were fairly stated in all material respects. The city’s total net position was $45.76 million, with $5.87 million in unrestricted net position, an increase of $338,000 from the prior year. The general fund had a change in fund balance of $250,000, largely due to a grant received during the year.
The audit also identified several material weaknesses in internal controls, including the lack of continuity in finance department personnel, which led to a loss of institutional knowledge during the fiscal year closure. Additionally, discrepancies were found in fair value estimates for certain assets, such as the Stranahan equity investment, where the city’s valuation differed from the auditor’s. There were also issues with agency funds, including a negative cash balance in the middle school Community Facilities District (CFD) and inconsistent document retention practices for journal entries.
The committee engaged in a detailed discussion with the auditor and finance staff, addressing concerns about the material weaknesses, the impact of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) grant on the general fund, and the city’s financial reporting practices. The committee requested that the audit report be updated to include a comparison of ARPA-related revenues and expenditures, and that the management letter be included in the document for transparency. The committee also discussed the need for improved internal controls, document retention, and the transition to electronic systems for journal entries.
The committee approved the presentation of the audited financial report and recommended forwarding it to the full City Council for action. The next agenda item, the proposed update to the Master Fee Schedule, was introduced by Nitish Sharma, who outlined the scope of the project, the methodology for updating fees, and the importance of aligning with state law and cost recovery principles. The committee requested further details on the timeline, deliverables, and the inclusion of a comparison with other jurisdictions for certain fees. The committee also discussed the potential for adjustments to fees for nonprofit users of Endeavor Hall and the existing fee waiver for the Clayton Community Band (CBC). These topics were deferred for further discussion at the next committee meeting.
Keywords: clean unmodified opinion, net position increase, material weaknesses, ARPA grant impact, internal control issues, fee schedule update, document retention, institutional knowledge loss
Item 4: Adjournment
Adjournment at [1:39:57].
See the full transcript here.